Paper detail

On the identification of the Fermi/LAT source 0FGL J2001.0+4352 with a BL Lac

We report on the identification of the gamma-ray source 0FGL J20001.0+4352 listed in the Fermi bright source catalogue. This object, which has an observed 1-100 GeV flux of (7.8 +/- 1.2) x 10^{-9} ph cm^{-2} s^{-1} and is located close to the Galactic plane, is not associated with any previously known high energy source. We use archival XMM-Newton and Swift/XRT data to localise with arcsec accuracy the X-ray counterpart of this GeV emitter and to characterise its X-ray properties: the source is bright (the 0.2-12 keV flux is 1.9 x 10^{-12} erg cm^{-2} s^{-1}), variable (by a factor of ~2) and with a steep power law spectrum (Gamma = 2.7). It coincides with a radio bright (~200 mJy at 8.4 GHz) and flat spectrum object (MG4 J200112+4352 in NED). Broad-band optical photometry of this source suggests variability also in this waveband, while a spectroscopic follow-up observation provides the first source classification as a BL Lac object. The source SED, as well as the overall characteristics and optical classification, point to a high frequency peaked blazar identification for 0FGL J2001.0+4352.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.