Paper detail

On the Hyperbolicity and Stability of $3+1$ Formulations of Metric $f(R)$ Gravity

$3+1$ formulations of the Einstein field equations have become an invaluable tool in Numerical relativity, having been used successfully in modeling spacetimes of black hole collisions, stellar collapse and other complex systems. It is plausible that similar considerations could prove fruitful for modified gravity theories. In this article, we pursue from a numerical relativistic viewpoint the $3+1$ formulation of metric $f(R)$ gravity as it arises from the fourth order equations of motion, without invoking the dynamical equivalence with Brans-Dicke theories. We present the resulting system of evolution and constraint equations for a generic function $f(R)$, subject to the usual viability conditions. We confirm that the time propagation of the $f(R)$ Hamiltonian and Momentum constraints take the same Mathematical form as in general relativity, irrespective of the $f(R)$ model. We further recast the 3+1 system in a form akin to the BSSNOK formulation of numerical relativity. Without assuming any specific model, we show that the ADM version of $f(R)$ is weakly hyperbolic and is plagued by similar zero speed modes as in the general relativity case. On the other hand the BSSNOK version is strongly hyperbolic and hence a promising formulation for numerical simulations in metric $f(R)$ theories.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.