Paper detail

On the horizons in a viable vector-tensor theory of gravitation

A certain vector-tensor (VT) theory of gravitation was tested in previous papers. In the background universe, the vector field of the theory has a certain energy density, which is appropriate to play the role of vacuum energy (cosmological constant). Moreover, this background and its perturbations may explain the temperature angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) obtained with WMAP (Wilkinson Map Anisotropy Probe), and other observations, as e.g., the Ia supernova luminosities. The parametrized post-Newtonian limit of the VT theory has been proved to be identical to that of general relativity (GR), and there are no quantum ghosts and classical instabilities. Here, the stationary spherically symmetric solution, in the absence of any matter content, is derived and studied. The metric of this solution is formally identical to that of the Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter solution of GR, but the role of the electrical charge is played by a certain quantity $Γ$ depending on both the vector field and the parameters of the VT theory. The black hole and cosmological horizons are discussed. The radius of the VT black hole horizon deviates with respect to that of the Kottler-Schwarzschild-de Sitter radius. Realistic relative deviations depend on $Γ$ and reach maximum values close to 30 per cent. For large enough $Γ$ values, there is no any black hole horizon, but only a cosmological horizon. The radius of this last horizon is almost independent of the mass source, the vector field components, and the VT parameters. It essentially depends on the cosmological constant value, which has been fixed by using cosmological observational data (CMB anisotropy, galaxy correlations and so on).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.