Paper detail

On the Hodge-type decomposition and cohomolgy groups of $k$-Cauchy-Fueter complexes over domains in the quaternionic space

The $k$-Cauchy-Fueter operator $ D_0^{(k) } $ on one dimensional quaternionic space $\mathbb{H}$ is the Euclidean version of helicity $\frac k 2$ massless field operator on the Minkowski space in physics. The $k$-Cauchy-Fueter equation for $k\geq 2$ is overdetermined and its compatibility condition is given by the $k$-Cauchy-Fueter complex. In quaternionic analysis, these complexes play the role of Dolbeault complex in several complex variables. We prove that a natural boundary value problem associated to this complex is regular. Then by using the theory of regular boundary value problems, we show the Hodge-type orthogonal decomposition, and the fact that the non-homogeneous $k$-Cauchy-Fueter equation $ D_0^{(k) } u=f$ on a smooth domain $Ω$ in $\mathbb{H}$ is solvable if and only if $f$ satisfies the compatibility condition and is orthogonal to the set $\mathscr H^1_{ (k) }(Ω)$ of Hodge-type elements. This set is isomorphic to the first cohomology group of the $k$-Cauchy-Fueter complex over $Ω$, which is finite dimensional, while the second cohomology group is always trivial.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.