Paper detail

On the Hill's Spherical Vortex in Fluid and Plasma, its Generalization, and Stability

In 1894 M.J.M. Hill published an article describing a spherical vortex moving through a stationary fluid. Using cylindrical coordinates and assuming the azimuthal velocity component zero, Hill found a simple solution that described this flow. A similar modern problem in the MHD framework was put forth in 1987 by A. A. Bobnev and in 1995 by R. Kaiser and D. Lortz who applied the setup to model a ball lighting. We present a much simpler derivation of Hill's spherical vortex using the Bragg-Hawthorne equation. In particular, by using the moving frame of reference, the Euler equations reduce to equilibrium flow which are equivalent to the static equilibrium MHD equations up to relabelling. A new generalized version of Hill's spherical vortex with a nonzero azimuthal component is derived. A physical solution to the static equilibrium MHD equations is computed by looking at a separated solution to the Grad-Shafranov equation in spherical coordinates. Finally, the stability of Hill's spherical vortex is examined by performing an axisymmetric perturbation described; it is shown that the Hill's spherical vortex is linearly unstable with respect to certain kinds of small perturbations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.