Paper detail

On the Grassmann condition number

We give new insight into the Grassmann condition of the conic feasibility problem \[ x \in L \cap K \setminus\{0\}. \] Here $K\subseteq V$ is a regular convex cone and $L\subseteq V$ is a linear subspace of the finite dimensional Euclidean vector space $V$. The Grassmann condition of this problem is the reciprocal of the distance from $L$ to the set of ill-posed instances in the Grassmann manifold where $L$ lives. We consider a very general distance in the Grassmann manifold defined by two possibly different norms in $V$. We establish the equivalence between the Grassmann distance to ill-posedness of the above problem and a natural measure of the least violated trial solution to its alternative feasibility problem. We also show a tight relationship between the Grassmann and Renegar's condition measures, and between the Grassman measure and a symmetry measure of the above feasibility problem. Our approach can be readily specialized to a canonical norm in $V$ induced by $K$, a prime example being the one-norm for the non-negative orthant. For this special case we show that the Grassmann distance ill-posedness of is equivalent to a measure of the most interior solution to the above conic feasibility problem.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.