Paper detail

On the GI-Completeness of a Sorting Networks Isomorphism

The subitemset isomorphism problem is really important and there are excellent practical solutions described in the literature. However, the computational complexity analysis and classification of the BZ (Bundala and Zavodny) subitemset isomorphism problem is currently an open problem. In this paper we prove that checking whether two sorting networks are BZ isomorphic to each other is GI-Complete; the general GI (Graph Isomorphism) problem is known to be in NP and LWPP, but widely believed to be neither P nor NP-Complete; recent research suggests that the problem is in QP. Moreover, we state the BZ sorting network isomorphism problem as a general isomorphism problem on itemsets --- because every sorting network is represented by Bundala and Zavodny as an itemset. The complexity classification presented in this paper applies sorting networks, as well as the general itemset isomorphism problem. The main consequence of our work is that currently no polynomial-time algorithm exists for solving the BZ sorting network subitemset isomorphism problem; however the CM (Choi and Moon) sorting network isomorphism problem can be efficiently solved in polynomial time.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.