Paper detail

On the generalized Helly property of hypergraphs, cliques, and bicliques

A family of sets is $(p,q)$-intersecting if every nonempty subfamily of $p$ or fewer sets has at least $q$ elements in its total intersection. A family of sets has the $(p,q)$-Helly property if every nonempty $(p,q)$-intersecting subfamily has total intersection of cardinality at least $q$. The $(2,1)$-Helly property is the usual Helly property. A hypergraph is $(p,q)$-Helly if its edge family has the $(p,q)$-Helly property and hereditary $(p,q)$-Helly if each of its subhypergraphs has the $(p,q)$-Helly property. A graph is $(p,q)$-clique-Helly if the family of its maximal cliques has the $(p,q)$-the Helly property and hereditary $(p,q)$-clique-Helly if each of its induced subgraphs is $(p,q)$-clique-Helly. The classes of $(p,q)$-biclique-Helly and hereditary $(p,q)$-biclique-Helly graphs are defined analogously. We prove several characterizations of hereditary $(p,q)$-Helly hypergraphs, including one by minimal forbidden partial subhypergraphs. We give an improved time bound for the recognition of $(p,q)$-Helly hypergraphs for each fixed $q$ and show that the recognition of hereditary $(p,q)$-Helly hypergraphs can be solved in polynomial time if $p$ and $q$ are fixed but co-NP-complete if $p$ is part of the input. In addition, we generalize to $(p,q)$-clique-Helly graphs the characterization of $p$-clique-Helly graphs in terms of expansions and give different characterizations of hereditary $(p,q)$-clique-Helly graphs, including one by forbidden induced subgraphs. We give an improvement on the time bound for the recognition of $(p,q)$-clique-Helly graphs and prove that the recognition problem of hereditary $(p,q)$-clique-Helly graphs is polynomial-time solvable for $p$ and $q$ fixed but NP-hard if $p$ or $q$ is part of the input. Finally, we provide different characterizations, give recognition algorithms, and prove hardness results for (hereditary) $(p,q)$-biclique-Helly graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.