Paper detail

On the game domination number of graphs with given minimum degree

In the domination game, introduced by Brešar, Klavžar and Rall in 2010, Dominator and Staller alternately select a vertex of a graph $G$. A move is legal if the selected vertex $v$ dominates at least one new vertex -- that is, if we have a $u\in N[v]$ for which no vertex from $N[u]$ was chosen up to this point of the game. The game ends when no more legal moves can be made, and its length equals the number of vertices selected. The goal of Dominator is to minimize whilst that of Staller is to maximize the length of the game. The game domination number $γ_g(G)$ of $G$ is the length of the domination game in which Dominator starts and both players play optimally. In this paper we establish an upper bound on $γ_g(G)$ in terms of the minimum degree $δ$ and the order $n$ of $G$. Our main result states that for every $δ\ge 4$, $$γ_g(G)\le \frac{30δ^4-56δ^3-258δ^2+708δ-432}{90δ^4-390δ^3+348δ^2+348δ-432}\; n.$$ Particularly, $γ_g(G) < 0.5139\; n$ holds for every graph of minimum degree 4, and $γ_g(G)< 0.4803\; n$ if the minimum degree is greater than 4. Additionally, we prove that $γ_g(G) < 0.5574\; n$ if $δ=3$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.