Paper detail

On the free rotation of a polarized spinning-top as a test of the correct radiation reaction torque

The formula for dipole radiation reaction torque acting on a system of charges, and the Larmor-like formula for the angular momentum loss by this system, differ in the time derivative term which is the analogue of the Schott term in the energy loss problem. In the well-known textbooks this discrepancy is commonly avoided via neglect of the Schott term, and the Larmor-like formula is preferred. In the present paper both formulae are used to derive two different equations of motion of a polarized spinning-top. Both equations are integrable for the symmetric top and lead to quite different solutions. That one following from the Larmor-like formula is physically unplausible, in contrast to another one. This result is accorded with the reinterpretation of Larmor's formula discussed recently in the pedagogical literature. It is appeared, besides, that the Schott term is of not only academic significance, but it may determine the behavior of polarized micro- and nanoparticles in nature or future experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.