Paper detail

On the Fraction of X-ray Weak Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

We investigate systematically the X-ray emission from type 1 quasars using a sample of 1825 Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) non-broad absorption line (non-BAL) quasars with Chandra archival observations. A significant correlation is found between the X-ray-to-optical power-law slope parameter ($α_{\rm OX}$) and the 2500 $Å$ monochromatic luminosity ($L_{\rm 2500~Å}$), and the X-ray weakness of a quasar is assessed via the deviation of its $α_{\rm OX}$ value from that expected from this relation. We demonstrate the existence of a population of non-BAL X-ray weak quasars, and the fractions of quasars that are X-ray weak by factors of $\ge6$ and $\ge10$ are $5.8\pm0.7\%$ and $2.7\pm0.5\%$, respectively. We classify the X-ray weak quasars (X-ray weak by factors of $\ge6$) into three categories based on their optical spectral features: weak emission-line quasars (WLQs; CIV REW $<16~Å$), red quasars ($Δ(g-i)>0.2$), and unclassified X-ray weak quasars. The X-ray weak fraction of $35_{- 9}^{+12}\%$ within the WLQ population is significantly higher than that within non-WLQs, confirming previous findings that WLQs represent one population of X-ray weak quasars. The X-ray weak fraction of $13_{- 3}^{+ 5}\%$ within the red quasar population is also considerably higher than that within the normal quasar population. The unclassified X-ray weak quasars do not have unusual optical spectral features, and their X-ray weakness may be mainly related to quasar X-ray variability.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.