Paper detail

On the Fraction of Star Clusters Surviving the Embedded Phase

In this paper we derive ages and masses for 276 clusters in the merger galaxy NGC 3256. This was achieved by taking accurate photometry in four wavebands from archival HST images. Photometric measurements are compared to synthetic stellar population (SSP) models to find the most probable age, mass and extinction. The cluster population of NGC 3256 reveals an increase in the star formation rate over the last 100 million years and the initial cluster mass function (ICMF) is best described by a power law relation with slope $α= 1.85 \pm 0.12$. Using the observed cluster population for NGC 3256 we calculate the implied mass of clusters younger than 10 million years old, and convert this to a cluster formation rate over the last 10 million years. Comparison of this value with the star formation rate (SFR) indicates the fraction of stars found within bound clusters after the embedded phase of cluster formation, $Γ$, is $22.9% \pm^{7.3}_{9.8} $ for NGC 3256. We carried out an in-depth analysis into the errors associated with such calculations showing that errors introduced by the SSP fitting must be taken into account and an unconstrained metallicity adds to these uncertainties. Observational biases should also be considered. Using published cluster population data sets we calculate $Γ$ for six other galaxies and examine how $Γ$ varies with environment. We show that $Γ$ increases with the star formation rate density and can be described as a power law type relation of the form $Γ(%) = (29.0\pm{6.0}) Σ_{SFR}^{0.24\pm0.04} (\msol yr^{-1} kpc^{-2})$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.