Paper detail

On the Formation of Double White Dwarfs through Stable Mass Transfer and a Common Envelope

Although several dozen double white dwarfs (DWDs) have been observed, for many the exact nature of the evolutionary channel(s) by which they form remains uncertain. The canonical explanation calls for the progenitor binary system to undergo two subsequent mass-transfer events, both of which are unstable and lead to a common envelope (CE). However, it has been shown that if both CE events obey the standard alpha-prescription (parametrizing energy loss), it is not possible to reproduce all of the observed systems. The gamma-prescription was proposed as an alternative to this description, instead parametrizing the fraction of angular momentum carried away in dynamical-timescale mass loss. In this paper, we analyze simultaneous energy and angular-momentum conservation, and show that the gamma-prescription cannot adequately describe a CE event for an arbitrary binary, nor can the first phase of mass loss always be understood in general as a dynamical-timescale event. We consider in detail the first episode of mass transfer in binary systems with initially low companion masses, with a primary mass in the range 1.0--1.3 solar masses and an initial mass ratio between the secondary and primary stars of 0.83--0.92. In these systems, the first episode of dramatic mass loss may be stable, non-conservative mass transfer. This strips the donor's envelope and dramatically raises the mass ratio; the considered progenitor binary systems can then evolve into DWDs after passing through a single CE during the second episode of mass loss. We find that such a mechanism reproduces the properties of the observed DWD systems which have an older component with less than approximately 0.46 solar masses and mass ratios between the younger and older WDs greater than 1.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.