Paper detail

On the Form of the Spitzer Leavitt Law and its Dependence on Metallicity

The form and metallicity-dependence of Spitzer mid-infrared Cepheid relations are a source of debate. Consequently, Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 um period-magnitude and period-color diagrams were re-examined via robust routines, thus providing the reader an alternative interpretation to consider. The relations (nearly mean-magnitude) appear non-linear over an extensive baseline (0.45< logPo <2.0), particularly the period-color trend, which to first-order follows constant (3.6-4.5) color for shorter-period Cepheids and may transition into a bluer convex trough at longer-periods. The period-magnitude functions can be described by polynomials (e.g., [3.6 um]=Ko-(3.071+-0.059) logPo-(0.120+-0.032)logPo^2), and Cepheid distances computed using 3.6 and 4.5 um relations agree and the latter provides a first-order consistency check (CO sampled at 4.5 um does not seriously compromise those distances). The period-magnitude relations appear relatively insensitive to metallicity variations ([Fe/H]~0 to -0.75), a conclusion inferred partly from comparing galaxy distances established from those relations and NED-D (n>700), yet a solid conclusion awaits comprehensive mid-infrared observations for metal-poor Cepheids in IC 1613 ([Fe/H] -1). The Cepheid-based distances were corrected for dust obscuration using a new ratio (i.e., A(3.6)/E(B-V)=0.18+-0.06) deduced from GLIMPSE (Spitzer) data.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.