Paper detail

On the Feedback Efficiency of Active Galactic Nuclei

(Abridged) We measure and analyze the energy, momentum, and mass feedback efficiencies due to radiation from AGN in relatively large scale outflows. Our measurements are based on the axisymmetric and time-dependent radiation-hydrodynamical simulations recently presented in Kurosawa & Proga. These simulations follow dynamics of gas under the influences of the AGN radiation and the gravity of the central 10^8 Msun black hole on scales from ~0.01 to ~10pc. We compare our Mdot_a-rho_o relation with that predicted by the Bondi accretion model. For high luminosities comparable to the Eddington limit, the power-law fit (Mdot_a ~ rho_o^q) to our models yields q=~0.5 instead of q=1.0 which is predicted by the Bondi model. This difference is caused by the outflows which are important for the overall mass budget at high luminosities. The maximum momentum and mass feedback efficiencies found in our models are ~10^-2 and ~10^-1, respectively. However, the outflows are much less important energetically: their thermal and kinetic powers in units of the radiative luminosity are ~10^-5 and ~10^-4, respectively. The efficiencies do not increase monotonically with the accretion luminosity but rather peak around the Eddington limit beyond which a steady state disk-wind-like solution exists. Our energy feedback efficiencies are significantly lower than 0.05, which is required in some cosmological and galaxy merger simulations. The low feedback efficiencies found here could have significant implications on the mass growth of super massive black holes in the early universe. We stress however that we have not considered the innermost parts of the accretion and outflow where radiation and matter interact most strongly. The feedback from this region could have efficiencies significantly above the low values found here.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.