Paper detail

On the fault-tolerance threshold for surface codes with general noise

Fault-tolerant quantum computing based on surface codes has emerged as a popular route to large-scale quantum computers capable of accurate computation even in the presence of noise. Its popularity is, in part, because the fault-tolerance or accuracy threshold for surface codes is believed to be less stringent than competing schemes. This threshold is the noise level below which computational accuracy can be increased by increasing physical resources for noise removal, and is an important engineering target for realising quantum devices. The current conclusions about surface code thresholds are, however, drawn largely from studies of probabilistic noise. While a natural assumption, current devices experience noise beyond such a model, raising the question of whether conventional statements about the thresholds apply. Here, we attempt to extend past proof techniques to derive the fault-tolerance threshold for surface codes subjected to general noise with no particular structure. Surprisingly, we found no nontrivial threshold, i.e., there is no guarantee the surface code prescription works for general noise. While this is not a proof that the scheme fails, we argue that current proof techniques are likely unable to provide an answer. A genuinely new idea is needed, to reaffirm the feasibility of surface code quantum computing.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.