Paper detail

On the falloff of radiated energy in black hole spacetimes

The goal of much research in relativity is to understand gravitational waves generated by a strong-field dynamical spacetime. Quantities of particular interest for many calculations are the Weyl scalar $ψ_4$, which is simply related to the flux of gravitational waves far from the source, and the flux of energy carried to distant observers, $\dot E$. Conservation laws guarantee that, in asympotically flat spacetimes, $ψ_4 \propto 1/r$ and $\dot E \propto 1/r^2$ as $r \to \infty$. Most calculations extract these quantities at some finite extraction radius. An understanding of finite radius corrections to $ψ_4$ and $\dot E$ allows us to more accurately infer their asymptotic values from a computation. In this paper, we show that, if the final state of the system is a black hole, then the leading correction to $ψ_4$ is ${\cal O}(1/r^3)$, and that to the energy flux is ${\cal O}(1/r^4)$ --- not ${\cal O}(1/r^2)$ and ${\cal O}(1/r^3)$ as one might naively guess. Our argument only relies on the behavior of the curvature scalars for black hole spacetimes. Using black hole perturbation theory, we calculate the corrections to the leading falloff, showing that it is quite easy to correct for finite extraction radius effects.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.