Paper detail

On the extraction of power-law parts of the probability density functions in star-forming clouds

We present a new approach to extract the power-law part of a density/column-density probability density function (rho-pdf/N-pdf) in star-forming clouds. It is based on the mathematical method bPLFIT of Virkar & Clauset (2014) and assesses the power-law part of an arbitrary distribution, without any assumptions about the other part of this distribution. The slope and deviation point are derived as averaged values as the number of bins is varied. Neither parameter is sensitive to spikes and other local features of the tail. This adapted bPLFIT method is applied to two different sets of data from numerical simulations of star-forming clouds at scales 0.5 and 500 pc and displays rho-pdf and N-pdf evolution in agreement with a number of numerical and theoretical studies. Applied to Herschel data on the regions Aquila and Rosette, the method extracts pronounced power-law tails, consistent with those seen in simulations of evolved clouds.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.