Paper detail

On the Expected Total Number of Infections for Virus Spread on a Finite Network

In this paper we consider a simple virus infection spread model on a finite population of $n$ agents connected by some neighborhood structure. Given a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, we begin with some fixed number of initial infected vertices. At each discrete time step, an infected vertex tries to infect its neighbors with probability $β\in (0,1)$ independently of others and then it dies out. The process continues till all infected vertices die out. We focus on obtaining proper lower bounds on the expected number of ever infected vertices. We obtain a simple lower bound, using \textit{breadth-first search} algorithm and show that for a large class of graphs which can be classified as the ones which locally "look like" a tree in sense of the \emph{local weak convergence}, this lower bound gives better approximation than some of the known approximations through matrix-method based upper bounds derived by Draief, Ganesh and Massoulie in 2008.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.