Paper detail

On the Expected Complexity of Random Convex Hulls

In this paper we present several results on the expected complexity of a convex hull of $n$ points chosen uniformly and independently from a convex shape. (i) We show that the expected number of vertices of the convex hull of $n$ points, chosen uniformly and independently from a disk is $O(n^{1/3})$, and $O(k \log{n})$ for the case a convex polygon with $k$ sides. Those results are well known (see \cite{rs-udkhv-63,r-slcdn-70,ps-cgi-85}), but we believe that the elementary proof given here are simpler and more intuitive. (ii) Let $\D$ be a set of directions in the plane, we define a generalized notion of convexity induced by $\D$, which extends both rectilinear convexity and standard convexity. We prove that the expected complexity of the $\D$-convex hull of a set of $n$ points, chosen uniformly and independently from a disk, is $O(n^{1/3} + \sqrt{nα(\D)})$, where $α(\D)$ is the largest angle between two consecutive vectors in $\D$. This result extends the known bounds for the cases of rectilinear and standard convexity. (iii) Let $\B$ be an axis parallel hypercube in $\Re^d$. We prove that the expected number of points on the boundary of the quadrant hull of a set $S$ of $n$ points, chosen uniformly and independently from $\B$ is $O(\log^{d-1}n)$. Quadrant hull of a set of points is an extension of rectilinear convexity to higher dimensions. In particular, this number is larger than the number of maxima in $S$, and is also larger than the number of points of $S$ that are vertices of the convex hull of $S$. Those bounds are known \cite{bkst-anmsv-78}, but we believe the new proof is simpler.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.