Paper detail

On the exit probability of the one dimensional q-voter model. Analytical results and simulations for large networks

We discuss the exit probability of the one dimensional $q$-voter model and present tools to obtain estimates about this probability both through simulations in large networks (around $10^7$ sites) and analyticaly in the limit where the network is infinetely large. We argue that the result $E(ρ) = \frac{ρ^q}{ρ^q + (1-ρ)^q}$, that was found in 3 previous works (2008 EPL 82 18006 and 2008 EPL 82 18007, for the case $q=2$ and 2011 PRE 84 031117, for $q>2$) using small networks (around $10^3$ sites), is a good approximation, but there are noticeable deviations for larger system sizes. We also show that, under some simple and intuitive hypothesis, the exit probability must obey the inequality, $\frac{ρ^q}{ρ^q + (1-ρ)} \leq E(ρ) \leq \fracρ{ρ+ (1-ρ)^q}$, in the infinite size limit. We believe this settles in the negative the suggestion made (2011 EPL 95 48005) that this result would be a finite size effect, with the exit probability actualy being a step function. We also show how the result, that the exit probability cannot be a step function, can be reconciled with the Galam unified frame, which was also a source of controversy.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.