Paper detail

On the exact survival probability by setting discrete random variables in E. Sparre Andersen's model

In this work, we propose a simplification of the Pollaczek-Khinchine formula for the ultimate time survival (or ruin) probability calculation in exchange for a few assumptions on the random variables which generate the renewal risk model. More precisely, we show the expressibility of the distribution function $$ \mathbb{P}\left(\sup_{n\geqslant1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(X_i-cθ_i)<u\right),\,u\in\mathbb{N}_0 $$ via the roots of the probability generating function $G_{X-cθ}(s)=1$, the expectation $\mathbb{E}(X-cθ)$, and the probability mass function of $X-cθ$. We assume that the random variables $X_1,\,X_2,\,\ldots$ and $cθ_1,\,cθ_2,\,\ldots$ are independent copies of $X$ and $cθ$ respectively, $c>0$, $X$ and $cθ$ are independent non-negative and integer-valued, and the support of $θ$ is finite. We give few numerical outputs of the proven theoretical statements when the mentioned random variables admit some particular distributions.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.