Paper detail

On the evolution of word usage of classical Chinese poetry

The hierarchy of classical Chinese poetry has been broadly acknowledged by a number of studies in Chinese literature. However, quantitative investigations about the evolutionary linkages of classical Chinese poetry are limited. The primary goal of this study is to provide quantitative evidence of the evolutionary linkages, with emphasis on character usage, among different period genres of classical Chinese poetry. Specifically, various statistical analyses are performed to find and compare the patterns of character usage in the poems of nine period genres, including shi jing, chu ci, Han shi , Jin shi, Tang shi, Song shi, Yuan shi, Ming shi, and Qing shi. The result of analysis indicates that each of nine period genres has unique patterns of character usage, with some Chinese characters that are preferably used in the poems of a particular period genre. The analysis on the general pattern of character preference implies a decreasing trend in the use of Chinese characters that rarely occur in modern Chinese literature along the timeline of dynastic types of classical Chinese poetry. The phylogenetic analysis based on the distance matrix suggests that the evolutionary linkages of different types of classical Chinese poetry are congruent with their chronological order, suggesting that character frequencies contain phylogenetic information that is useful for inferring evolutionary linkages among various types of classical Chinese poetry. The estimated phylogenetic tree identifies four groups (shi jing, chu ci), (Han shi, Jin shi), (Tang shi, Song shi, Yuan shi), and (Ming shi, Qing shi). The statistical analyses conducted in this study can be generalized to analyze the data sets of general Chinese literature. Such analyses can provide quantitative insights about the evolutionary linkages of general Chinese literature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.