Paper detail

On the evolution of irradiated turbulent clouds: A comparative study between modes of triggered star-formation

Here we examine the evolution of irradiated clouds using the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics ({\small SPH}) algorithm coupled with a ray-tracing scheme that calculates the position of the ionisation-front at each timestep. We present results from simulations performed for three choices of {\small IR}-flux spanning the range of fluxes emitted by a typical {\small B}-type star to a cluster of {\small OB}-type stars. The extent of photo-ablation, of course, depends on the strength of the incident flux and a strong flux of {\small IR} severely ablates a {\small MC}. Consequently, the first star-formation sites appear in the dense shocked layer along the edges of the irradiated cloud. Radiation-induced turbulence readily generates dense filamentary structure within the photo-ablated cloud although several new star-forming sites also appear in some of the densest regions at the junctions of these filaments. Prevalent physical conditions within a {\small MC} play a crucial role in determining the mode, i.e., filamentary as compared to isolated pockets, of star-formation, the timescale on which stars form and the distribution of stellar masses. The probability density functions ({\small PDF}s) derived for irradiated clouds in this study are intriguing due to their resemblance with those presented in a recent census of irradiated {\small MC}s. Furthermore, irrespective of the nature of turbulence, the protostellar mass-functions({\small MF}s) derived in this study follow a power-law distribution. When turbulence within the cloud is driven by a relatively strong flux of {\small IR} such as that emitted by a massive {\small O}-type star or a cluster of such stars, the {\small MF} approaches the canonical form due to Salpeter, and even turns-over for protostellar masses smaller than $\sim$0.2 M$_{\odot}$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.