Paper detail

On the evolution of gas clouds exposed to AGN radiation. I. Three-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulations

We perform three-dimensional radiation hydrodynamic simulations of uniform dusty gas clouds irradiated by an active galactic nucleus (AGN) to investigate the dependence of evolution of clouds on the ionization parameter $\mathcal{U}$ and the Str{ö}mgren number $\mathcal{N}_{S}$. We find that the evolution can be classified into two cases depending on $\mathcal{U}$. In low $\mathcal{U}$ cases ($\mathcal{U}\approx 10^{-2}$), the evolution is mainly driven by photo-evaporation. A approximately spherically-symmetric evaporation flow with velocity of $100\operatorname{-}150\;\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}}$ is launched from the irradiated face. The cloud is compressed by a D-type shock with losing its mass due to photo-evaporation and is finally turned into a dense filament by $t\lesssim 1.5t_{\mathrm{sc}}$. In high $\mathcal{U}$ cases ($\mathcal{U}\approx 5\times 10^{-2}$), radiation pressure suppresses photo-evaporation from the central part of the irradiated face, reducing photo-evaporation rate. A evaporation flow from the outskirts of the irradiated face is turned into a high velocity ($\lesssim 500\;\mathrm{km\;s^{-1}}$) gas wind because of radiation pressure on dust. The cloud is swept by a radiation pressure-driven shock and becomes a dense gas disk by $t\approx t_{\mathrm{sweep}}$. Star formation is expected in these dense regions for both cases of $\mathcal{U}$. We discuss the influences of the AGN radiation on the clumpy torus. A simple estimate suggests that the clumps are destroyed in timescales shorter than their orbital periods. For the clumpy structure to be maintained over long period, the incident radiation field needs to be sufficiently weaken for most of the clumps, or, some mechanism that creates the clumps continuously is needed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.