Paper detail

On the evolution of a star cluster and its multiple stellar systems following gas dispersal

We investigate the evolution, following gas dispersal, of a star cluster produced from a hydrodynamical calculation. We find that when the gas, initially comprising 60% of the mass, is removed, the system settles into a bound cluster containing 30-40% of the stellar mass surrounding by an expanding halo of ejected stars. The bound cluster expands from an initial radius of <0.05 pc to 1-2 pc over 4-10 Myr, depending on how quickly the gas is removed, implying that stellar clusters may begin with far higher stellar densities than usually assumed. With rapid gas dispersal the most massive stars are found to be mass segregated for the first ~1 Myr of evolution, but classical mass segregation only develops for cases with long gas removal timescales. Eventually, many of the most massive stars are expelled from the bound cluster. Despite the high initial stellar density and the extensive dynamical evolution of the system, we find that the stellar multiplicity is almost constant during the 10 Myr of evolution. This is because the primordial multiple systems are formed in a clustered environment and, thus, by their nature are already resistant to further evolution. The majority of multiple system evolution is confined to the decay of high-order systems and the formation of a significant population of very wide (10^4-10^5 AU) multiple systems in the expanding halo. This formation mechanism for wide binaries potentially solves the problem of how most stars apparently form in clusters and yet a substantial population of wide binaries exist in the field. Many of these wide binaries and the binaries produced by the decay of high-order multiple systems have unequal mass components, potentially solving the problem that hydrodynamical simulations of star formation are found to under-produce unequal-mass solar-type binaries.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.