Paper detail

On the Error Performance of Systematic Polar Codes

Systematic polar codes are shown to outperform non-systematic polar codes in terms of the bit-error-rate (BER) performance. However theoretically the mechanism behind the better performance of systematic polar codes is not yet clear. In this paper, we set the theoretical framework to analyze the performance of systematic polar codes. The exact evaluation of the BER of systematic polar codes conditioned on the BER of non-systematic polar codes involves in $2^{NR}$ terms where $N$ is the code block length and $R$ is the code rate, resulting in a prohibitive number of computations for large block lengths. By analyzing the polar code construction and the successive-cancellation (SC) decoding process, we use a statistical model to quantify the advantage of systematic polar codes over non-systematic polar codes, so called the systematic gain in this paper. A composite model is proposed to approximate the dominant error cases in the SC decoding process. This composite model divides the errors into independent regions and coupled regions, controlled by a coupling coefficient. Based on this model, the systematic gain can be conveniently calculated. Numerical simulations are provided in the paper showing very close approximations of the proposed model in quantifying the systematic gain.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.