Paper detail

On the Error Exponent of Approximate Sufficient Statistics for M-ary Hypothesis Testing

Consider the problem of detecting one of M i.i.d. Gaussian signals corrupted in white Gaussian noise. Conventionally, matched filters are used for detection. We first show that the outputs of the matched filter form a set of asymptotically optimal sufficient statistics in the sense of maximizing the error exponent of detecting the true signal. In practice, however, M may be large which motivates the design and analysis of a reduced set of N statistics which we term approximate sufficient statistics. Our construction of these statistics is based on a small set of filters that project the outputs of the matched filters onto a lower-dimensional vector using a sensing matrix. We consider a sequence of sensing matrices that has the desiderata of row orthonormality and low coherence. We analyze the performance of the resulting maximum likelihood (ML) detector, which leads to an achievable bound on the error exponent based on the approximate sufficient statistics; this bound recovers the original error exponent when N = M. We compare this to a bound that we obtain by analyzing a modified form of the Reduced Dimensionality Detector (RDD) proposed by Xie, Eldar, and Goldsmith [IEEE Trans. on Inform. Th., 59(6):3858-3874, 2013]. We show that by setting the sensing matrices to be column-normalized group Hadamard matrices, the exponents derived are ensemble-tight, i.e., our analysis is tight on the exponential scale given the sensing matrices and the decoding rule. Finally, we derive some properties of the exponents, showing, in particular, that they increase linearly in the compression ratio N/M.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.