Paper detail

On the ergodicity of cylindrical transformations given by the logarithm

Given $\a \in [0,1]$ and $φ: \T \to \R$ measurable, the {\it cylindircal cascade} $S_{\a,φ}$ is the map from $\T \times \R$ to itself given by $S_{\a,φ} (x,y) = (x+\a,y+φ(x))$ that naturally appears in the study of some ordinary differential equations on $\R^3$. In this paper, we prove that for a set of full Lebesgue measure of $\a \in [0,1]$ the cylindrical cascades $S_{\a,φ}$ are ergodic for every smooth function $φ$ with a logarithmic singularity, provided that the average of $φ$ vanishes. Closely related to $S_{\a,φ}$ are the special flows constructed above $R_\a$ and under $φ+c$ where $c \in \R$ is such that $φ+c>0$. In the case of a function $φ$ with an asymmetric logarithmic singularity our result gives the first examples of ergodic cascades $S_{\a,φ}$ with the corresponding special flows being mixing. Indeed, when the latter flows are mixing the usual techniques used to prove the {\it essential value criterion} for $S_{\a,φ}$, that is equivalent to ergodicity, fail and we device a new method to prove this criterion that we hope could be useful in tackling other problems of ergodicity for cocycles preserving an infinite measure.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.