Paper detail

On the Ergodic Rate of Cognitive Radio Inspired Uplink Multiple Access

With the exponential increase of the number of devices in the communication ecosystem toward the upcoming sixth generation (6G) of wireless networks, more enabling technologies and potential wireless architectures are necessary to fulfill the networking requirements of high throughput, massive connectivity, ultra reliability, and heterogeneous quality of service (QoS). In this work, we consider an uplink network consisting of a primary user (PU) and a secondary user (SU) and, by integrating the concept of cognitive radio and multiple access, two protocols based on rate-splitting multiple access and non-orthogonal multiple access with successive interference cancellation are investigated in terms of ergodic rate. The considered protocols aim to serve the SU in a resource block which is originally allocated solely for the PU without negatively affecting the QoS of the PU. We extract the ergodic rate of the SU considering a specific QoS for the PU for the two protocols. In the numerical results, we validate the theoretical analysis and illustrate the superiority of the considered protocols over two benchmark schemes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.