Paper detail

On the Effects of Pointing Jitter, Actuators Drift, Telescope Rolls and Broadband Detectors in Dark Hole Maintenance and Electric Field Order Reduction

Space coronagraphs are projected to detect exoplantes that are at least 1e10 times dimmer than their host stars. Yet, the actual detection threshold depends on the instrument's wavefront stability and varies by an order of magnitude with the choice of observation strategy and post-processing method. In this paper the authors consider the performance of the previously introduced observation strategy (dark hole maintenance) and post-processing algorithm (electric field order reduction) in the presence of various realistic effects. In particular, it will be shown that under some common assumptions, the telescope's averaged pointing jitter translates into an additional light source incoherent with the residual light from the star (speckles), and that jitter "modes" can be identified in post-processing and distinguished from a planet signal. We also show that the decrease in contrast due to drift of voltages in deformable mirror actuators can be mitigated by recursive estimation of the electric field in the high-contrast region of the image (dark hole) using Electric Field Conjugation (EFC). Moreover, this can be done even when the measured intensity is broadband, as long as it is well approximated by an incoherent sum of monochromatic intensities. Finally, we assess the performance of closed-loop vs. open-loop observation scenarios through a numerical simulation of the Wide-Field Infra-Red Survey Telescope (WFIRST). In particular, we compare the post-processing factors of Angular Differential Imaging (ADI) with and without Electric Field Order Reduction (EFOR), which we extended to account for possible telescope rolls and the presence of pointing jitter. For all observation parameters considered in this paper, close-loop dark hole maintenance resulted in significantly higher post-processing accuracy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.