Paper detail

On the Effective Spatial Separations in the Clustering of Faint Galaxies

Several recent measurements have been made of the angular correlation function $w(θ,m)$ of faint galaxies in deep surveys (e.g., Hubble Deep Field, HDF). Are the measured correlations indicative of gravitational growth of primordial perturbations or of the relationship between galaxies and (dark matter dominated) galaxy haloes? A first step in answering this question is to determine the typical spatial separations of galaxies whose spatial correlations, $ξ(r,z),$ contribute most to w. The median spatial separation of galaxy pairs contributing to a fraction $p$ of $w$ for a galaxy survey is denoted by r_{eff} and compared with the perpendicular distance, $r_\perp,$ at the median redshift, z_{median}, of the galaxies. Over a wide range in $ξ$ growth rates $ε$ and in $z_{median}, \r_eff(50%) \ltsim r_\perp$ and $\r_eff(90%) \sim 4 r_\perp.$ Values of r_eff for typical redshift distributions indicate that many $w$ measurements correspond to spatial correlations at comoving length scales well below 1 h^-1 Mpc. For $Ω_0=1$ and $λ_0=0$, the correlation signal at 4\arcsec predominant in the Villumsen et al. (1996) estimates of $w$ for faint HDF galaxies corresponds to r_eff(50%)(HDF) \approx 40 h^-1 kpc; other cosmologies and angles up to 10\arcsec can increase this to r_eff(50%)(HDF) $\ltsim 200 h^-1 kpc. The proper separations are (1+z) times smaller. These scales are small: the faint galaxy $w$ measurements are at scales where halo and/or galaxy existence, let alone interactions, may modify the spatial correlation function. These measurements could maybe be used to probe the radial extent of haloes at high redshift.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.