Paper detail

On the effective oxygen yield in the disks of spiral galaxies

The factors influencing chemical evolution of galaxies are poorly understood. Both gas inflow and gas outflow reduce a gas-phase abundance of heavy elements (metallicity) whereas the ongoing star formation continuously increases it. To exclude the stellar nucleosynthesis from consideration, we analyze for the sample of 14 spiral galaxies the radial distribution of the effective yield of oxygen $y_{eff}$, which would be identical to the true stellar yield (per stellar generation) $y_o$ if the evolution followed the closed box model. As the initial data for gas-phase abundance we used the O/H radial profiles from Moustakas, Kennicutt, Tremonti et al. (2010), based on two different calibrations (Pilyugin & Thuan 2005 (PT2005) and Kobulnicky & Kewley 2004 (KK2004) methods). In most of galaxies with the PT2005 calibration, which we consider as a preferred one, the yield $y_{eff}$ in the main disk ($R \ge 0.2~R_{25}$, where $R_{25}$ is the optical radius) increases with radius, remaining lower than the empirically found true stellar yield $y_o$. This may indicate the inflow of low-enriched gas predominantly to the inner disk regions, which reduces $y_{eff}$. We show that the maximal values of the effective yield in the main disks of galaxies, $y_{eff,max}$, anti-correlate with the total mass of galaxies and with the mass of their dark halo enclosed within $R_{25}$. It allows to propose the higher role of gas accretion for galaxies with massive halos. We also found that the radial gradient of oxygen abundance normalized to $R_{25}$ has a tendency to be shallower in the systems with lower dark halo to stellar mass ratio within the optical radius, which, if confirmed, gives evidences of the effective radial mixing of gas in galaxies with the relatively light dark matter halo.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.