Paper detail

On the effect of strain and triaxiality on void evolution in a heterogeneous microstructure -- A statistical and single void study of damage in DP800

In order to improve the understanding of damage evolution in mechanically heterogeneous microstructures, like the ones of dual-phase steels, the influence of the applied stress state is a key element. In this work, we studied the influence of the globally applied stress state on the evolution of damage in such a microstructure. Classical damage models allow predictions of damage during deformation based on considerations of the material as an isotropic continuum. Here, we investigate their validity in a dual phase microstructure that is locally dominated by its microstructural morphological complexity based on a statistical ensemble of thousands of individual voids formed under different stress states. For this purpose, we combined a calibrated material model incorporating damage formation to assess the local stress state in samples with different notch geometries and high-resolution electron microscopy of large areas using a deep learning-based automated micrograph analysis to detect and classify microstructural voids according to their source of origin. This allowed us to obtain both the continuum stress state during deformation and statistically relevant data of individual void formation. We found that the applied plastic strain is the major influence on the overall number, and therefore the nucleation of new voids, while triaxiality correlates with the median void size, supporting its proposed influence on void growth. In contrast, coalescence of voids leading to failure appears related to local instabilities in the form of shear band formation and is therefore only indirectly determined by the global stress state in that it determines the global distribution, density and size of voids.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.