Paper detail

On the easiest way to connect $k$ points in the Random Interlacements process

We consider the random interlacements process with intensity $u$ on ${\mathbb Z}^d$, $d\ge 5$ (call it $I^u$), built from a Poisson point process on the space of doubly infinite nearest neighbor trajectories on ${\mathbb Z}^d$. For $k\ge 3$ we want to determine the minimal number of trajectories from the point process that is needed to link together $k$ points in $\mathcal I^u$. Let $$n(k,d):=\lceil \frac d 2 (k-1) \rceil - (k-2).$$ We prove that almost surely given any $k$ points $x_1,...,x_k\in \mathcal I^u$, there is a sequence ofof $n(k,d)$ trajectories $γ^1,...,γ^{n(k,d)}$ from the underlying Poisson point process such that the union of their traces $\bigcup_{i=1}^{n(k,d)}\tr(γ^{i})$ is a connected set containing $x_1,...,x_k$. Moreover we show that this result is sharp, i.e. that a.s. one can find $x_1,...,x_k in I^u$ that cannot be linked together by $n(k,d)-1$ trajectories.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.