Paper detail

On the dynamic consistency of hierarchical risk-averse decision problems

In this paper, we consider a risk-averse decision problem for controlled-diffusion processes, with dynamic risk measures, in which there are two risk-averse decision makers (i.e., {\it leader} and {\it follower}) with different risk-averse related responsibilities and information. Moreover, we assume that there are two objectives that these decision makers are expected to achieve. That is, the first objective being of {\it stochastic controllability} type that describes an acceptable risk-exposure set vis-á-vis some uncertain future payoff, and while the {\it second one} is making sure the solution of a certain risk-related system equation has to stay always above a given continuous stochastic process, namely {\it obstacle}. In particular, we introduce multi-structure, time-consistent, dynamic risk measures induced from conditional $g$-expectations, where the latter are associated with the generator functionals of two backward-SDEs that implicitly take into account the above two objectives along with the given continuous obstacle process. Moreover, under certain conditions, we establish the existence of optimal hierarchical risk-averse solutions, in the sense of viscosity solutions, to the associated risk-averse dynamic programming equations that formalize the way in which both the {\it leader} and {\it follower} consistently choose their respective risk-averse decisions. Finally, we remark on the implication of our result in assessing the influence of the {\it leader'}s decisions on the risk-averseness of the {\it follower} in relation to the direction of {\it leader-follower} information flow.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.