Paper detail

On the distribution of stellar remnants around massive black holes: slow mass segregation, star cluster inspirals and correlated orbits

We study the long term dynamical evolution of stellar mass black holes (BHs) at the Galactic center (GC) and put constraints on their number and central mass distribution. Models of the GC are considered that have not yet achieved a steady state under the influence of random gravitational encounters. Contrary to some recent claims that mass-segregation can rapidly rebuild a density cusp in the stars, we find that time scales associated with cusp regrowth are longer than the Hubble time. These results cast doubts on standard models that postulate high densities of BHs near the GC and motivate studies that start from initial conditions which correspond to well-defined physical models. For the first time, we consider the distribution of BHs in a dissipationless formation model for the Milky Way nuclear cluster (NC), in which massive stellar clusters merge in the GC to form a nucleus. We simulate the successive inspiral of massive clusters containing an inner dense cluster of BHs. The pre-existing mass segregation is not completely erased as the clusters are disrupted by the massive black hole tidal field. As a result, after 12 inspiral events a NC forms in which the BHs have higher central densities than the stars. After evolving the model for 5-10 Gyr, the BHs do form a steep central cusp, while the stellar distribution maintains properties that resemble those of the Milky Way NC. Finally, we investigate the effect of BH perturbations on the motion of the GC S-stars, as a means of constraining the number of the perturbers. We find that reproducing the S-star orbital distribution requires >~1000 BHs within 0.1 pc of Sgr A*. A dissipationless formation scenario for the Milky Way NC is consistent with this lower limit and therefore could reconcile the need for high central densities of BHs (to explain the orbits of the S-stars), with the missing-cusp problem of the GC giant star population.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.