Paper detail

On the distribution of gaps between consecutive primes

Erdös conjectured that the set J of limit points of d_n/logn contains all nonnegative numbers, where d_n denotes the nth primegap. The author proved a year ago (arXiv: 1305.6289) that J contains an interval of type [0,c] with a positive ineffective value c. In the present work we extend this result for a large class of normalizing functions. The only essential requirement is that the function f(n) replacing logn should satisfy f(n)<<lognloglognloglogloglogn/(logloglogn)^2 (with a small implied constant), the well-known Erdös-Rankin bound for the largest known gaps between consecutive primes. The work also proves that apart from a thin set of exceptional functions the original Erdös conjecture holds if logn is replaced by a non-exceptional function f(n). The paper also gives a new proof for a result of Helmut Maier which generalized the Erdös-Rankin bound for an arbitrarily long finite chain of consecutive primegaps. The proof uses a combination of methods of Erdös-Rankin,Maynard-Tao and Banks-Freiberg-Maynard. Since the submission of the present work the very important recent simultaneous and independent works of Ford-Green-Konjagin-Tao (arXiv:1408.4505 [math.NT] and Maynard (aerXiv:1408.5110 [math.NT]) appeared on arXiv and they proved the old conjecture of Erdös which asserts that the lower bound for large gaps exceeds Clognloglognloglogloglogn/(logloglogn)^2 with an arbitrarily large constant C. In this new version we prove the same assertions as in the original work for the case when f(n)<<Clognloglognloglogloglogn/(logloglogn)^2 with an arbi8trarily large constant C, in particular we show that there are blocks of m primes for any m such that all gaps between these primes simultaneously satisfy the lower estimate Clognloglognloglogloglogn/(logloglogn)^2 with an arbitrarily large constant C. The proof uses the method of Maynard.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.