Paper detail

On the distribution of frequency ratios of kHz QPOs

The width (W), root mean squared amplitude (Rs) of lower and upper kHz quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) from accreting neutron stars vary with frequency. Similarly, the QPO frequency varies with the source count rate (S). Hence, the significance of a QPO, scaling as S x Rs^2/W^(1/2) will also depend on frequency. In addition, the significance also scales up with the square root of the integration time of the Fourier power density spectrum (T). Consequently, depending on the way data are considered, kHz QPOs may be detected only over a limited range of their frequency spans or detected predominantly at some frequencies, leading potentially to biases in the observed distributions of frequencies or frequency ratios. Although subject of much controversy, an observed clustering of QPO frequency ratios around 3/2 in Sco X-1, also seen in other sources, has been previously used as an argument supporting resonance based models of neutron star QPOs. In this paper, we measure how the statistical significance of both kHz QPOs vary with frequency for three prototype neutron star kHz QPO sources, namely 4U1636-536, 4U0614+091 and Sco X-1. As the significance of QPO detection depends on frequency, we show that in sensitivity-limited observations (as in the case of the RXTE/PCA), a simultaneous detection of both the lower and upper kHz QPOs can only be achieved over limited frequency ranges. As a result, even a uniform distribution of QPO frequencies will lead to peaks (in particular around 3/2) in the histogram of frequency ratios. This implies that the observed clustering of ratios does not provide any evidence for intrinsically preferred frequency ratios, thus weakening the case for a resonance mechanism at the origin of neutron star kHz QPOs.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.