On the Displacement for Covering a d−d-dimensional Cube with Randomly Placed Sensors

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Abstract

Consider nn sensors placed randomly and independently with the uniform distribution in a d−d-dimensional unit cube (d≥2d\ge 2). The sensors have identical sensing range equal to rr, for some r>0r >0. We are interested in moving the sensors from their initial positions to new positions so as to ensure that the d−d-dimensional unit cube is completely covered, i.e., every point in the d−d-dimensional cube is within the range of a sensor. If the ii-th sensor is displaced a distance did_i, what is a displacement of minimum cost? As cost measure for the displacement of the team of sensors we consider the aa-total movement defined as the sum Ma:=∑i=1ndiaM_a:= \sum_{i=1}^n d_i^a, for some constant a>0a>0. We assume that rr and nn are chosen so as to allow full coverage of the d−d-dimensional unit cube and a>0a > 0. The main contribution of the paper is to show the existence of a tradeoff between the d−d-dimensional cube, sensing radius and aa-total movement. The main results can be summarized as follows for the case of the d−d-dimensional cube. If the d−d-dimensional cube sensing radius is 12n1/d\frac{1}{2n^{1/d}} and n=mdn=m^d, for some m∈Nm\in N, then we present an algorithm that uses O(n1−a2d)O\left(n^{1-\frac{a}{2d}}\right) total expected movement (see Algorithm 2 and Theorem 5). If the d−d-dimensional cube sensing radius is greater than 33/d(31/d−1)(31/d−1)12n1/d\frac{3^{3/d}}{(3^{1/d}-1)(3^{1/d}-1)}\frac{1}{2n^{1/d}} and nn is a natural number then the total expected movement is O(n1−a2d(ln⁡nn)a2d)O\left(n^{1-\frac{a}{2d}}\left(\frac{\ln n}{n}\right)^{\frac{a}{2d}}\right) (see Algorithm 3 and Theorem 7). In addition, we simulate Algorithm 2 and discuss the results of our simulations.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.