Paper detail

On the Discrepancy of Jittered Sampling

We study the discrepancy of jittered sampling sets: such a set $\mathcal{P} \subset [0,1]^d$ is generated for fixed $m \in \mathbb{N}$ by partitioning $[0,1]^d$ into $m^d$ axis aligned cubes of equal measure and placing a random point inside each of the $N = m^d$ cubes. We prove that, for $N$ sufficiently large, $$ \frac{1}{10}\frac{d}{N^{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2d}}} \leq \mathbb{E} D_N^*(\mathcal{P}) \leq \frac{\sqrt{d} (\log{N})^{\frac{1}{2}}}{N^{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2d}}},$$ where the upper bound with an unspecified constant $C_d$ was proven earlier by Beck. Our proof makes crucial use of the sharp Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality and a suitably taylored Bernstein inequality; we have reasons to believe that the upper bound has the sharp scaling in $N$. Additional heuristics suggest that jittered sampling should be able to improve known bounds on the inverse of the star-discrepancy in the regime $N \gtrsim d^d$. We also prove a partition principle showing that every partition of $[0,1]^d$ combined with a jittered sampling construction gives rise to a set whose expected squared $L^2-$discrepancy is smaller than that of purely random points.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.