Paper detail

On the discontinuous Galerkin method for solving boundary value problems for the Helmholtz equation: A priori and a posteriori error analyses

We apply the local discontinuous Galerkin (LDG for short) method to solve a mixed boundary value problems for the Helmholtz equation in bounded polygonal domain in 2D. Under some assumptions on regularity of the solution of an adjoint problem, we prove that: (a) the corresponding indefinite discrete scheme is well posed; (b) there is convergence with the expected convergence rates as long as the meshsize h is small enough. We give precise information on how small h has to be in terms of the size of the wavenumber and its distance to the set of eigenvalues for the same boundary value problem for the Laplacian. We also present an a posteriori error estimator showing both the reliability and efficiency of the estimator complemented with detailed information on the dependence of the constants on the wavenumber. We finish presenting extensive numerical experiments which illustrate the theoretical results proven in this paper and suggest that stability and convergence may occur under less restrictive assumptions than those taken in the present work.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.