Paper detail

On the dimension of invariant measures of endomorphisms of $\mathbb{CP}^k$

Let $f$ be an endomorphism of $\mathbb{CP}^k$ and $ν$ be an $f$-invariant measure with positive Lyapunov exponents $(λ_1,\...,λ_k)$. We prove a lower bound for the pointwise dimension of $ν$ in terms of the degree of $f$, the exponents of $ν$ and the entropy of $ν$. In particular our result can be applied for the maximal entropy measure $μ$. When $k=2$, it implies that the Hausdorff dimension of $μ$ is estimated by $\dim_{\cal H} μ\geq {\log d \over λ_1} + {\log d \over λ_2}$, which is half of the conjectured formula. Our method for proving these results consists in studying the distribution of the $ν$-generic inverse branches of $f^n$ in $\mathbb{CP}^k$. Our tools are a volume growth estimate for the bounded holomorphic polydiscs in $\mathbb{CP}^k$ and a normalization theorem for the $ν$-generic inverse branches of $f^n$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.