Paper detail

On the differences in the periodic behaviour of magnetic helicity flux in flaring active regions with and without X-class events

Observational pre-cursors of large solar flares provide a basis for future operational systems for forecasting. Here, we study the evolution of the normalized emergence (EM), shearing (SH) and total (T) magnetic helicity flux components for 14 flaring with at least one X-class flare) and 14 non-flaring ($<$ M5-class flares) active regions (ARs) using the Spaceweather Helioseismic Magnetic Imager Active Region Patches vector magnetic field data. Each of the selected ARs contain a $δ$-type spot. The three helicity components of these ARs were analyzed using wavelet analysis. Localised peaks of the wavelet power spectrum (WPS) were identified and statistically investigated. We find that: i) the probability density function of the identified WPS peaks for all the EM, SH and T profiles can be fitted with a set of Gaussian functions centered at distinct periods between $\sim$ 3 to 20 hours. ii) There is a noticeable difference in the distribution of periods found in the EM profiles between the flaring and non-flaring ARs, while no significant difference is found in the SH and T profiles. iii) In flaring ARs, the distributions of the shorter EM/SH/T periods ($<$ 10 hrs) split up into two groups after flares, while the longer periods ($>$ 10 hrs) do not change. iv) When the EM periodicity does not contain harmonics, the ARs do not host a large energetic flare. Finally, v) significant power at long periods ($\sim$ 20 hour) in the T and EM components may serve as pre-cursor for large energetic flares.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.