Paper detail

On the diameter of the polytope of the stable marriage with ties

The stable marriage problem with ties is a well-studied and interesting problem in game theory. We are given a set of men and a set of women. Each individual has a preference ordering on the opposite group, which can possibly contain ties. A stable marriage is given by a matching between men and women for which there is no blocking pair, i.e., a men and a women who strictly prefer each other to their current partner in the matching. In this paper, we study the diameter of the polytope given by the convex hull of characteristic vectors of stable marriages, in the setting with ties. We prove an upper bound of $\lfloor \frac{n}{3}\rfloor$ on the diameter, where $n$ is the total number of men and women, and give a family of instances for which the bound holds tight. Our result generalizes the bound on the diameter of the standard stable marriage polytope (i.e., the well-known polytope that describes the setting without ties), developed previously in the literature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.