Paper detail

On the determination of the leptonic CP phase

The combination of data from long-baseline and reactor oscillation experiments leads to a preference of the leptonic CP phase $δ_{\rm CP}$ in the range between $π$ and $2π$. We study the statistical significance of this hint by performing a Monte Carlo simulation of the relevant data. We find that the distribution of the standard test statistic used to derive confidence intervals for $δ_{\rm CP}$ is highly non-Gaussian and depends on the unknown true values of $θ_{23}$ and the neutrino mass ordering. Values of $δ_{\rm CP}$ around $π/2$ are disfavored at between $2σ$ and $3σ$, depending on the unknown true values of $θ_{23}$ and the mass ordering. Typically the standard $χ^2$ approximation leads to over-coverage of the confidence intervals for $δ_{\rm CP}$. For the 2-dimensional confidence region in the ($δ_{\rm CP},θ_{23}$) plane the usual $χ^2$ approximation is better justified. The 2-dimensional region does not include the value $δ_{\rm CP} = π/2$ up to the 86.3\% (89.2\%)~CL assuming a true normal (inverted) mass ordering. Furthermore, we study the sensitivity to $δ_{\rm CP}$ and $θ_{23}$ of an increased exposure of the T2K experiment, roughly a factor 12 larger than the current exposure and including also anti-neutrino data. Also in this case deviations from Gaussianity may be significant, especially if the mass ordering is unknown.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.