Paper detail

On the Determination of the Evolutionary Status of Supernova Remnants from Radio Observation Data

This paper aims to give a brief review of a new concept for the preliminary determination of the evolutionary status of supernova remnants (SNRs). Data obtained by radio observations in continuum are used. There are three different methods underlying the new concept: the first one based on the location of observationally obtained radio surface brightness and corresponding diameter of an SNR on the theoretically derived Sigma-D tracks; the second one based on the forms of radio spectra; and the third one, based on the magnetic field strengths that are estimated through the equipartition (eqp) calculation. Using a combination of these methods, developed over the last two decades by the Belgrade SNR Research Group, we can estimate the evolutionary status of SNRs. This concept helps radio observers to determine preliminarily the stage of the evolution of an SNR observed in radio domain. Additionally, this concept was applied for several SNRs, observed by the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA), and the corresponding results are reviewed here. Moreover, some of the results are revised in this review to reflect the updated recently published Sigma-D and eqp analyses.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.