Paper detail

On the detection of stellar differential rotation based on the Fourier transform of spectral line profiles

It is known that stellar differential rotation can be detected by analyzing the Fourier transform of spectral line profiles, since the ratio of the 1st- and 2nd-zero frequencies is a useful indicator. This approach essentially relies on the conventional formulation that the observed flux profile is expressible as a convolution of the rotational broadning function and the intrinsic profile, which implicitly assumes that the local intensity profile does not change over disk. Although this postulation is unrealistic in the strict sense, how the result is affected by this approximation is still unclear. In order to examine this problem, profiles of several lines (showing different center-limb variations) were simulated using a model atmosphere corresponding to a mid-F dwarf by integrating intensity profiles for various combinations of vsini (rot. velocity), alpha (diff. degree), and i (inc. angle), and their Fourier transforms were computed to check whether zeros are detected at the predicted positions or not. For this comparison purpose, a large grid of standard rotational broadening functions and their transforms/zeros were also calculated. It turned out that the situation criticaly depends on vsini: In case of vsini>~20km/s where rotational broadening is predominant over other line broadening velocities (typically several km/s), the 1st/2nd zeros of the transform are confirmed almost at the expected positions. In contrast, deviations begin to appear as vsini is lowered, and the zero features of the transform are totally different from the expectation at vsini as low as ~10km/s, which means that the classical formulation is no more valid. Accordingly, while the zero-frequency approach is safely applicable to studying differential rotation in the former broader-line case, it would be difficult to practice for the latter sharp-line case.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.