Paper detail

On the detectability of massive black hole merger eventsby LISA

The launch of space based gravitational wave (GW) detectors (e.g. Laser Interferometry Space Antenna; LISA) and current and upcoming Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTAs) will extend the GW window to low frequencies, opening new investigations into dynamical processes involving massive black hole binaries (MBHBs) and their mergers across cosmic time. MBHBs are expected to be among the primary sources for the upcoming low frequency ($10^{-4}-10^{-1}$ Hz) window probed by LISA. It is important to investigate the expected MBH merger rates and associated signals, to determine how potential LISA events are affected by physics included in current models. To study this, we post-process the large population of MBHBs in the Illustris simulation to account for dynamical friction time delays associated with BH infall/inspiral. We show that merger delays associated with binary evolution have the potential to decrease the expected merger rates, with $M_{\rm{BH}} > 10^6 M_\odot$ MBHBs (the lowest mass in Illustris) decreasing from $\sim 3$ yr$^{-1}$ to $\sim 0.1 $yr$^{-1}$, and shifting the merger peak from z $\sim 2$ to $\sim 1.25$. During this time, we estimate that accretion grows the total merging mass by as much as 7x from the original mass. Importantly, however, dynamical friction associated delays (which shift the mergers toward lower-redshift and higher-masses) lead to a stronger signal/strain for the emitted GWs in the LISA band, increasing mean frequency from $10^{-3.1}$ to $10^{-3.4}-10^{-4.0}$ Hz, and mean strain from $10^{-17.2}$ to $10^{-16.3}-10^{-15.3}$. Finally, we show that after including a merger delay and associated $M_{\rm{BH}}$ growth, mergers still tend to lie on the typical $M_{\rm{BH}}-M_*$ relation, but with an increased likelihood of an undermassive black hole.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.