Paper detail

On the detectability of HI 21-cm in MgII absorption system

We investigate the effect of two important, but oft neglected, factors which can affect the detectability of HI 21-cm absorption in MgII absorption systems: The effect of line-of-sight geometry of the coverage of the background radio flux and any possible correlation between the 21-cm line strength and the rest frame equivalent width of the MgII line. Regarding the former, while the observed detection rate at small angular diameter distance ratios is a near certainty, for an unbiased sample, where either a detection or a non-detection are equally likely, at ratios > 0.8 the observed detection rate has an 8 sigma significance, suggesting that the mix of ratios values at z < 1 is correlated with the mix of detections and non-detections at low redshift, while the exclusively high values of the ratio at z > 1 contribute to the low detection rates at high redshift. In DLAs, the correlation between the 21-cm line strength and the MgII equivalent width is dominated by the velocity spread of the 21-cm line. This has recently been shown not to hold for MgII systems in general. However, we do find the significance of the correlation to increase when the MgII absorbers with MgI equivalent widths of >0.5 A are added to the DLA sample. Large values of the angular diameter distance ratio may explain why the absorbers which have similar equivalent widths to the detections remain undetected. We do, however, also find the neutral hydrogen column densities of the non-detections to be significantly lower. Applying the 21-cm line strength/equivalent width correlation to yield column densities for the MgII absorbers in which this is unmeasured, we find no evidence of a cosmological evolution in the neutral hydrogen column density.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.